<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BruceCass.com &#187; California</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brucecass.com/tag/california/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brucecass.com</link>
	<description>San Francisco wine education veteran Bruce Cass reviews wines and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 21:47:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>CA Wine Market ~ Past &amp; Future</title>
		<link>http://brucecass.com/ca-wine-market-past-future/278/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ca-wine-market-past-future</link>
		<comments>http://brucecass.com/ca-wine-market-past-future/278/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 00:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wine Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brucecasswinelab.com/blog/?p=278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes it seems wines just stay the same, as consumer preferences cycle through predictable patterns. Historical Wine Background &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;When one considers something as venerable as wine, two generations seems rather paltry. Forty years isn’t very old for a vine, and it’s nothing but a quick glance compared to the 5,000 years human beings have been [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes it seems wines just stay the same, as consumer preferences cycle through predictable patterns.</p>
<h1>Historical Wine Background</h1>
<p><code>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</code>When one considers something as venerable as wine, two generations seems rather paltry. Forty years isn’t very old for a vine, and it’s nothing but a quick glance compared to the 5,000 years human beings have been seriously turning grapes into commerce. Nevertheless, the knowledge base of humankind has advanced rapidly since 1970, and wine is no different.<br />
<code>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</code>It may be helpful to set the stage. In the early 1960’s there were only a few hundred U.S. troops in Viet Nam, and they were still called “advisors.” At that time nearly half the wine consumed in America was called “Port” and/or “Sherry.” JFK and his dazzling wife were in the White House and setting fashion around the world. Zinfandel was the most widely planted “premium” wine grape in California. The Civil Rights marches in Mississippi and Alabama were just beginning to happening, and 60% of the grapes crushed in CA for white wine were Thompson Seedless. Pills for birth control were about to come on to the market, and Robert Mondavi, although just turning 50, was still employed as a salesman for his family’s winery, Charles Krug. Women still went to college to get an ‘Mrs.’ degree, and you could buy a 1,200 sq. ft. cottage on a half acre in St. Helena for $30,000. Of course if you lived in St. Helena, you’d have to drive to San Francisco to get a good restaurant meal. The 280 freeway down the Peninsula from San Francisco had not been built yet, but South Bay wineries like Paul Masson, Almaden, and Mirassou were prestige players on the national scene. Seven years later, in the late 1960’s, while Jimi Hendricks and Janis Joplin were setting the tone musically, Gallo’s Hearty Burgundy was hailed by the New York Times as particularly noteworthy amongst international wine competitors because it was sound, clean, reliable, and reasonably priced.</p>
<h2>Consumer Wine Style Preferences</h2>
<p><code>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</code>Yeah, things have changed.<br />
<code>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</code>But I’ve changed too. Sometimes it is hard to say the wines or the marketplace have really changed more dramatically than my own preferences and opportunities have… </p>
<p><code>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</code>To read this post in its entirety, including commentary about changing wine styles and the importance of future markets, visit the <a href="https://alumni.stanford.edu/get/page/blogs/blog/?ciid=227">Stanford Wine Blog</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brucecass.com/ca-wine-market-past-future/278/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MALBEC</title>
		<link>http://brucecass.com/malbec/262/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=malbec</link>
		<comments>http://brucecass.com/malbec/262/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 05:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wine Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current release wines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mid-range value wines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[other red wines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South America]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brucecasswinelab.com/blog/?p=262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Intense color. Middleweight. Tar + plums w/ cocoa + flowers around each corner. Hope popularity doesn’t screw it up. Malbec Description &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;Malbec is au currant. It is selling briskly during a recession when most wines are retrenching. It goes great with a big hunka’ red meat, and confers a gaucho image which understandably appeals to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intense color. Middleweight. Tar + plums w/ cocoa + flowers around each corner. Hope popularity doesn’t screw it up.</p>
<h1>Malbec Description</h1>
<p><code>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</code>Malbec is <i>au currant</i>. It is selling briskly during a recession when most wines are retrenching. It goes great with a big hunka’ red meat, and confers a gaucho image which understandably appeals to salarymen everywhere. Dr. Roger Corder, a British pharmacology researcher, even says Argentine Malbecs are particularly rich in the <b>polyphenols</b> which help protect against artery disease. Good news when you’re having a big hunka’ red meat. And really good Malbec can be had for less than $25. Sign me up!</p>
<h2>Malbec Wine Education</h2>
<p><code>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</code>The success of Argentine Malbec on the U.S. market over the last four years is the envy of wine producing regions all over the world. <a href="http://www.winesofargentina.org">Wines of Argentina</a>  says they sold 628,000 cases of Malbec in America in 2005, and 3.15 million cases in 2009. Particularly jealous is the district of <b>Cahors</b> in southwest France, which specializes in Malbec (traditionally called <i>Cot</i> there), and from whence the Argentine vines are reputed to have come.<br />
<code>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</code>Of course commercial success on our shores usually has more to do with pricing and adroit marketing than it has to do with what is in the bottle. I’d never bet against the physical attractiveness of any Argentine winery’s PR staff. And, until last month, exchange rates <u>did</u> give the Argentine wines an enormous price advantage over their European counterparts.<br />
<code>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</code>By way of incentive, <b>Argentina</b> has 50,000 acres of Malbec planted, which is more than California has planted to Zinfandel. France has less than 15,000 acres, and even that has been steadily declining since 1970. Malbec vines are quite sensitive to mildew. Hence the variety seems logically more applicable to arid climates such as <b>Mendoza</b> (in the rain shadow of the Andes), than it would be in the frequent summer rains of southwest France.<br />
<code>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</code>Nevertheless a battle of sorts has been joined, and vintners in both California and Washington State are paying attention. There are only 1,500 acres of Malbec in <b>California</b>. Which explains why in 2008 Malbec grapes sold for $4,550 a ton in Napa Valley ~ almost the same price as Cabernet Sauvignon, and nearly twice as much money per ton as Merlot. In Sonoma Malbec grapes were 15% more expensive than Cab Sauv. And in the Sierra Foothills Malbec is nearly 50% more expensive than any other grape. Supply and demand. You think Wall Street is a casino? Try farming.</p>
<h3>Malbec recommendations</h3>
<p><code>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</code>Read this post in its entirety on the <a href="https://pgnet.stanford.edu/get/page/blogs/post-view/?ciid=2505">Stanford Wine Blog</a>, including specific wine reviews and suggestions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brucecass.com/malbec/262/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pisoni Vyd</title>
		<link>http://brucecass.com/pisoni-vyd/252/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=pisoni-vyd</link>
		<comments>http://brucecass.com/pisoni-vyd/252/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wine Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bottle-aged wines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classic wines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current release wines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pinot Noir]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brucecasswinelab.com/blog/?p=252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Expensive viticulture, ribald personality. Can wines truly reflect both? Does PN need to improve over 8 years in btl? Wine Education Background &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;Gary Pisoni is a wonderful incarnation of a colorful, eccentric lineage of wine personalities in California. They go back a long way, and they’re legendary. Agoston Harazthy, who claimed to be a Hungarian [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Expensive viticulture, ribald personality. Can wines truly reflect both?  Does PN need to improve over 8 years in btl?</p>
<h1>Wine Education Background</h1>
<p><code>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</code><b>Gary Pisoni</b> is a wonderful incarnation of a colorful, eccentric lineage of wine personalities in California. They go back a long way, and they’re legendary. <b>Agoston Harazthy</b>, who claimed to be a Hungarian Count, and reputedly died in Nicaragua while trying to cross a crocodile-infested stream on a small tree limb. <b>Paul Masson</b>, who delighted in hosting sparkling wine baths for actresses at his Saratoga mountain winery during the waning years of the Victorian age. His successor, <b>Martin Ray</b>, who sold shares in his winery (<b>Mount Eden</b>) to investors, then denied them access to the property, while pricing his wines at three times more than any other examples on the market. <b>Dr. David Bruce</b>, <b>Randall Grahm</b>, <b>Jim Clendenen</b>. <b>Mike Grgich</b>, always ready with a double-entendre, and a staunch claimant to never having owned a pH meter. Or my favorite, <b>Marilyn Otterman</b> (<b>Sarah’s Vyd</b>), who always responded in interviews as two separate people: as herself and as Sarah. Marilyn was such a delight. She always described her wines in the female gender. As in, “My Ventana Chardonnay is always the center of attention at parties. You know, all boobs and hips. Whereas my Estate Chardonnay is more reserved, tall with a Greek nose. She hangs back, and waits for maturity on <u>your</u> part.”<br />
<code>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</code>It’s an extensive thread ~ completely wacked out, and further distinguished by the fact they ALL made (or make) excellent wine. Gary Pisoni fits right in. He reminds me of Mario Batali: tuxedo shirt and madras shorts; catnip for the high-end collector and socialite crowds …</p>
<p>Read this entire post, including information on the <b><i>World of Pinot Noir</i> festival</b>, descriptions of 6 current-release Pinot Noirs from Pisoni Vyd grapes, and 6 older examples, on the <a href="https://pgnet.stanford.edu/get/page/blogs/post-view/?ciid=1272">Stanford wine blog</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brucecass.com/pisoni-vyd/252/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BV PR Cab</title>
		<link>http://brucecass.com/bv-pr-cab/230/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=bv-pr-cab</link>
		<comments>http://brucecass.com/bv-pr-cab/230/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 03:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wine Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bottle-aged wines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cab Sauv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classic wines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brucecasswinelab.com/blog/?p=230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Class compared 1994 + 1995 vintages. Clear advantage 95. Better acid, much more distinct bouquet. Steak house wine. Wine Classes &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;Tasted in Art &#038; Science of Fine Wine class held in Menlo Park (see Class Schedule). Beaulieu 1994 and 1995 Private Reserve Cabs are priced around $150 per bottle (if available) in most fine wine [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Class compared 1994 + 1995 vintages. Clear advantage 95. Better acid, much more distinct bouquet. Steak house wine.</p>
<h1>Wine Classes</h1>
<p><code>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</code>Tasted in <i>Art &#038; Science of Fine Wine</i> class held in Menlo Park (see <a href="http://brucecasswinelab.com/Art-Science-of-Fine-Wine">Class Schedule</a>). Beaulieu 1994 and 1995 Private Reserve Cabs are priced around $150 per bottle (if available) in most fine wine stores. Reference year-to-year California growing conditions on this website under <i><a href="http://brucecasswinelab.com/?q=wineinfo/cavintage/19901999">Useful Wine Info – California Vintage Reports</a></i>.</p>
<h2>Wine Education Background</h2>
<p><code>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</code><b>Beaulieu ‘Georges de Latour’ Cabernet Sauvignon</b> is a classic of the American landscape, and has been for a very long time. Originally crafted by the legendary <b>Andre Tchelischeff</b>, from grapes grown on Napa Valley’s Rutherford Bench, the wine was famously aged in 100% American oak. That gave the wine a considerable relationship with Bourbon<span id="more-230"></span> ~ also aged in American oak, as is Australia’s most expensive wine, Penfold’s Grange Hermitage.  What more could any cowboy want? Big slab of corn-fed beefsteak, and to wash it down, a drink that smelled like Whisky Sour and pipe tobacco. Made in America, like <i>Cat on a Hot Tin Roof</i>. Modestly expensive, but not rare. For a long time, Beaulieu made 25,000 cases of the ‘Private Reserve’ Cab each year.<br />
<code>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</code>Things have changed a little bit since Andre’s time. In the 1990’s Beaulieu replanted much of their venerable BV #1 and BV #2 vineyards as a phylloxera precaution. During the process they did some clonal experimentation, concluding that while a mix of Cabernet clones was desirable, the best outcomes always included a big percentage of <b>UCD Cab clone #6</b>. That clone produced smaller berries, and smaller clusters than the others. It also got riper faster, and retained better acid. Beaulieu also began adding a little Merlot to the Private Reserve. And they started using some French oak as a complement to their American barrels. BV PR Cab is not the strapping hulk of yesteryear, but it’s still pretty robust. </p>
<h3>How Does the Wine Taste?</h3>
<p><code>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</code>What are the best vintages for BV Private Reserve? Depends whether you want to drink it at age eight, or at age twenty. Andre always thought his best vintages were the hottest years; vintages such as 1958, 1966, and 1974. Perhaps he was anticipating the current fad for ultra-ripe Cabs. 1974 was a perfect example. Temperatures during the Summer of 1974 were relatively mild, but they soared from late-August through September. The Cabs were intense, fruity, and softly supple when released. They sold like hotcakes. Contrast the 1973 vintage. It started late, due to a cold, wet Spring. Summer was cool. Harvest progressed under sunny skies, but without high temperatures. Cabs from 1973 were nicely balanced, but more acidic, and roughly tannic in youth. When superseded in the marketplace by the lush ‘74’s, the ’73’s retreated from buyers’ radar. That is until it became fashionable in the late 1980’s and early 1990’s to compare the two vintages side-by-side. At age twenty, BV PR 1974 Cab was flabby, with prune-ish overtones, while the 1973 BV PR Cab had all the structural integrity in the world, a rich cigar box bouquet, and enormous persistence in the glass.<br />
<code>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</code>The results from comparing BV PR 1994 Cab to the 1995 version were similar, although the chronology is reversed. In this instance, 1994 was the dry, mild Winter followed by a balmy Summer and a dry harvest. The ’94 Cabs were smooth, concentrated, and very impressive upon release. 1995 was a wet, cold Winter and Spring. Budbreak was delayed; Summer was cool. Harvest was very late, but conducted under cool, dry skies. The ’95 Cabs were hard, closed, and unrelentingly tannic upon release. In 1999, I would have preferred (hell, I did prefer) to drink the ’94 BV PR Cab rather than its successor.<br />
<code>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</code>Tasted last week, the ’94 BV PR Cab was squat and stodgy compared to its ’95 brother. Nothing wrong with it; just that its singing days are clearly numbered. Its vaunted fruitiness was diminishing and dehydrated. Twenty minutes swirling in the glass left the ’94 bent over gasping with its hands on its knees. The ’95 was much more lively in the glass. No longer tight, its walnut pesto bouquet was rich, deep, and obvious to everyone in the room. It was longer on the palate, and in the memory. It finished with the reminder of black stone fruits, and it maintained that impression for an hour. Today, I wouldn’t be disappointed with either wine served by itself. But I’d be much happier with the ’95, if I got my choice after tasting them both side-by-side.</p>
<h4>Wine-Food Pairing</h4>
<p><code>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</code>Beef is on the menu for most people when Beaulieu Private Reserve is on the sideboard. But I think not roast beef. I think the key is grilled beef, and that implies a smokey flavor. It is a natural match with the heated leather overtones in the bouquet of bottle-aged Cabernet Sauvignon. Moreover, I don’t mind doing a little chewing when enhanced flavor is part of the deal. That implies tougher cuts, maybe grass-fed beef, longer marinade times. Think Argentine-style indoor grill.<br />
<code>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</code>BV PR is a good investment wine. Not in the sense of money for resale. But certainly in the sense of consistency, reliability, and track record. Laying some bottles down, from adroitly selected vintages, for ten years of maturation in your cellar is always a good idea. It is a strategy which will allow you to drink well-developed Cabernet at a noteworthy financial savings: comparable to investing the same amount of money at an interest rate of 7% compounded annually. Call it portfolio diversification; very liquid assets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brucecass.com/bv-pr-cab/230/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inexpensive Chardonnay</title>
		<link>http://brucecass.com/inexpensive-chardonnay/226/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=inexpensive-chardonnay</link>
		<comments>http://brucecass.com/inexpensive-chardonnay/226/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 05:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wine Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chardonnay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current release wines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inexpensive bargain wines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brucecasswinelab.com/blog/?p=226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2008 Fess Parker: intense fruit, conc in mouth, honey-butter overtones, AND under $20. Fried chicken w/ yams. Wine Market Background &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;In class I often extol the virtues of Sauvignon Blanc by pointing out there are several world-class examples priced between $15 and $19. I then exclaim, “There’s no such thing as world-class Chardonnay under $20!” [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2008 Fess Parker: intense fruit, conc in mouth, honey-butter overtones, AND under $20. Fried chicken w/ yams.</p>
<h1>Wine Market Background</h1>
<p><code>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</code>In class I often extol the virtues of Sauvignon Blanc by pointing out there are several world-class examples priced between $15 and $19. I then exclaim, “There’s no such thing as world-class Chardonnay under $20!” And I do believe that statement to be true. At least it used to be. Which is not to say there haven’t always been a handful of eminently pleasing Chardonnays priced under $20. It is just that competition amongst Chardonnays has always been so much more intense than it is in other white wine varieties. In America, Chardonnay outsells both Pinot Gris (Grigio) and Sauvignon Blanc individually by a factor of four or five. Good Chardonnay can easily command $20 to $40 a bottle, and great Chardonnay commands $50 to $100. The only reason for a winery to price a very fine Chardonnay under $20 would have been when they needed to sell 50,000 cases of it, or if they had very limited confidence in their sales and marketing capacity. Of course, this Recession economy is creating many unusual, and enjoyable surprises for buyers.</p>
<h2>Wine Education</h2>
<p><code>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</code>There are several justifications for the expense of a good bottle of Chardonnay. First, the grape itself is not particularly distinctive. It doesn’t have the unique aromatic signature of (say) Gewürztraminer. Nor does it have the strong flavor of (say) Sauvignon Blanc. That means concentration is doubly important and, in Chardonnay, that translates to lower yield. Lower yield means higher price per ton. Whether one gets three tons per acre in Sauvignon Blanc, or five tons per acre, the distinctive flavor is still going to be fairly obvious. Not so with Chardonnay. Taking a Chardonnay vineyard from three tons/acre to five tons/acre would have an effect<span id="more-226"></span>…</p>
<h3>Wine-Food Matching</h3>
<p><code>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</code>Read this post in its entirety, with wine descriptions and food-wine matches, on the <a href="https://pgnet.stanford.edu/get/page/blogs/blog/?ciid=227">Stanford Wine Blog</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brucecass.com/inexpensive-chardonnay/226/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

